Showing posts with label plagiarism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plagiarism. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Plagiarism Checkers
You know we prefer the "fence to the ambulance" plagiarism-proofing approach to assignments, but we know that sometimes tools can help teachers find those incidents of plagiarism. Make Use Of offers a summary of five plagiarism checker tools in this post.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Paper Mills
The Chronicle of Higher Education has an eye-opening investigative article on paper mills. The article Cheating Goes Global as Essay Mills Multiply attempts to track the physical location of one company called Essay Writers by sleuthing through mail drops, phone records, and business registration from Virginia to Kiev to Manila and back. Fascinating.
Equally fascinating are the interviews with professors and students. Students claiming they only use the papers as research and professors expressing surprise and disbelief that such papers would be requested by their students. And one professor suggesting assignments be "plagiarism proof."
Recommended reading.
Equally fascinating are the interviews with professors and students. Students claiming they only use the papers as research and professors expressing surprise and disbelief that such papers would be requested by their students. And one professor suggesting assignments be "plagiarism proof."
Recommended reading.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Fair Use and the Courts
This is an interesting article from Ars Technica addressing plagiarism, copyright, and fair use. It reports on the results of a court case in which students sued TurnItIn on the grounds that it violated the students' copyright by storing their papers online. The students lost because according to a federal court decision:
TurnItIn's use was "fair" according to the four factors found in US copyright law, with most weight being given to the "transformative" nature of what TurnItIn was doing with the papers.Plaintiffs argued that [TurnItIn parent company] iParadigms’ use of their works cannot be transformative because the archiving process does not add anything to the work. TurnItIn merely stores the work unaltered and in its entirety. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals felt that argument "was misguided." Their conclusion:
The use of a copyrighted work need not alter or augment the work to be transformative in nature... iParadigms' use of plaintiffs’ works had an entirely different function and purpose than the original works; the fact that there was no substantive alteration to the works does not preclude the use from being transformative in nature.So, an interesting interpretation of fair use. The article describes the court decision as a "primer on fair use," providing another copyright resource.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)